Monday, November 1, 2010

Financial Domination

Financial Domination is a very controversial fetish - a lot of fetishists and lifestyle BDSM people feel that it's a scam and that a financial slave is being duped into parting with his cash, but I don't think anything could be further from the truth.

If someone is deliberately paying being told he is getting NOTHING then he either has a fetish for paying money (not inconceivable in a world that contains something as pointless as furries, is it?) or he is paying for a completely intangible value.

There is no more stupidity in paying a HIGH END FINANCIAL DOMINATRIX than there is in buying a Porsche. There's really no good reason to do either. Any car that runs will get you from point A to point B and any free picture of a cute girl will get your balls drained.

A pay pet, like a Porsche driver, has needs that exceed the simple exchange of "I pay you you beat me, this hard and here only" which most professional "Domination" consists of. A pay slave is, in fact, a REAL chattel SLAVE more so than most lifestyle slaves who lay claim to the mantle.

If slavery is, in fact, the exploitation of labor without pay to the laborer, then Financial Domination is much more M/s than the overcomplicated and emotionally fraught M/s that you find in the BDSM lifestyle.

A financial fetishist shows the inclination to slavery - slavery as defined by capital and not sexual capital only.

I, myself, have an ongoing interest in both the emotional/psychological lifestyle enmeshed form of slavery AND pure, brutal, simple financial slavery. Financial Domination is a subset of the fetishes that I enjoy and indulge in without apology. I would make no apology for my boot worship or disciplinary caning fetishes - and this, to me, is really no different.

But isn't it preying on people, the emotionally weak? The vulnerable?

I invite people to consider the entire existence of the M/f BDSM scene. Isn't male Dominance and any and all scene pertaining to it, preying on women brainwashed by a lifetime of sexist conditioning and myth?

Isn't there something damaged and broken about any woman who would submit to a male willingly?

Or is it time to treat bottoms and submissives as the choice making adults they are? Whether male or female, whether paying or offering themselves sexually?

No comments:

Post a Comment